Guillaume ADENIER
Refutation of Bell's theorem
(38K, RevTex4, 8 pages.)

ABSTRACT.  Bell's theorem is based on a linear combination of spin 
correlation functions, each of these functions being characterized 
by a different couple of arguments. The meaning of the 
simultaneous presence of these different couples of arguments in 
the same equation can be understood in two radically different 
ways: either as a strongly objective meaning, that is, all 
correlation functions are counterfactual properties of the same 
set of particle pairs, or as a weakly objective meaning, that is, 
each correlation function is measured on a different (and 
contextual) set of particle pairs. It is demonstrated that once 
this meaning is explicated, no discrepancy can appear between 
local realistic theories and quantum mechanics, and that the 
discrepancy exhibited by Bell's theorem is due to a meaningless 
comparison between the local realistic inequality written within 
strongly objective interpretation (thus relevant to a single set 
of particle pairs) and the quantum mechanical prediction written 
within weakly objective interpretation (thus relevant to several 
different sets of particle pairs).